Deal Tear Down·June 2026

    Lakeside Drive

    Lakeside Drive

    This is the first guest installment in the Decision Desk series — Kirby and Amy Hasseman walking through a deal they were genuinely close to signing. A 4-bed home on a man-made lake in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, half a mile from the Atlantic, in a Myrtle Beach submarket that's been gentrifying for a decade.

    The seller was motivated. The bones were right. The location checked every box that matters in coastal South Carolina STR underwriting — distance to water, parking, configuration, finish level. From thirty thousand feet, this was a deal you say yes to.

    This teardown is about the slow accumulation of small signals that pulled the verdict the other way. None of them are dramatic. None of them would have killed it alone. The decision-making in this piece is the point — what a disciplined no looks like on a property you actually want.

    Wanting a property is the single most dangerous starting position in real estate underwriting. Not because want is wrong — but because want is louder than the numbers, and the numbers are the only thing that survives the closing table. The Lakeside Drive deal arrived with want already in the room. Kirby and Amy had been talking about a beach house for years. This one was within reach, in a market they knew, on a body of water that meant something to them personally.

    The property itself was clean. Four bedrooms, lakefront on a man-made lake inside a quiet residential pocket of Surfside Beach, half a mile from the ocean. The Myrtle Beach metro is one of the more durable STR markets on the east coast — diversified demand, a long shoulder season, a regulatory environment that's been comparatively stable for a category that's been getting beat up everywhere else. On the surface, this was the kind of acquisition that pencils inside two minutes on a napkin.

    The seller was motivated for reasons that didn't show up in the listing. That kind of motivation usually creates room — room on price, room on terms, room on close timeline. The Hassemans had financing lined up. Twenty-five percent down was workable. The first pass of the underwriting cleared the bar they'd set for themselves before they started looking.

    What changed the verdict wasn't a single issue. It was a pattern. The kind of pattern you only see when you make yourself slow down on a deal you already want. The kind of pattern that's easy to rationalize away in isolation and impossible to ignore once you write them down on the same page.

    This installment matters because most Decision Desk pieces end at a property you wouldn't have known about otherwise. This one ends at a property a lot of buyers would have closed on without looking twice. The discipline isn't in saying no to bad deals. It's in saying no to good deals that aren't right for the capital you're deploying, the season you're in, and the next twelve months of attention you actually have to give.

    The full teardown covers the seller story, the lake-versus-ocean economic model, the underwriting that worked and the underwriting that didn't, the moment Kirby and Amy realized the deal had started carrying them, and the Decision Verdict — including what would have flipped it green.

    Member Preview

    Read the full teardown

    Drop your name and email and we'll unlock the full Decision Desk write-up. You'll also receive future installments in your inbox.

    By submitting you agree to receive Decision Desk emails from The RealWise Collective. Unsubscribe anytime. We don't share your information.

    Stay close to the desk

    Get new posts in your inbox.

    Field Notes is the weekly companion to the Decision Desk — one scroll, three minutes, the signal underneath the headlines.